Revista ALCANCE
Volumen 8, Número 1, 2025
Instituto de Posgrado
Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí
ISSN-e: 2960-8244
LEARNING A SECOND LANGUAGE WITH A COMMUNICATIVE
APPROACH THROUGH NEUROEDUCATION
ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL
APRENDER UN SEGUNDO IDIOMA CON UN ENFOQUE COMUNICATIVO A
TRAVÉS DE LA NEUROEDUCACIÓN
.
Autores:
1George Robert Matute Castro,
2Nelly Geoconda Villacreses Toala,
3Martha Geoconda Menéndez Loor.
4Johao Andrés Briones García.
1󹵸󹵹󹵺󹵻󹵼 george.matute@educacion.gob.ec
󷃆󷄓󷄔 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-205
Docente del Centro de Idiomas, Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí
2󹵸󹵹󹵺󹵻󹵼 martha.menendez@educacion.gob.ec
󷃆󷄓󷄔 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9399-7337
Docente de la Unidad Educativa Quince de Octubre
3󹵸󹵹󹵺󹵻󹵼 nelly.villacreses@educacion.gob.ec
󷃆󷄓󷄔 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1629-8548
Docente de la Unidad Educativa Quince de Octubre
4󹵸󹵹󹵺󹵻󹵼 jxbriones@gmail.com
󷃆󷄓󷄔 https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7489-8043
Docente de la Unidad Educativa Particular Almirante H. Nelson
Recibido:20-12-2024 Aprobado:06-03-2025 Publicado:30-07-2025
Volumen: 8
Número: 1
Año: 2025
Paginación: 59-72
Correspondencia autor: : george.matute@educacion.gob.ec
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
60 |
RESUMEN
Este estudio explora la integración del enfoque comunicativo y la neuroeducación
como estrategia integral para mejorar la adquisición de una segunda lengua. La enseñanza
tradicional de lenguas suele basarse en ejercicios gramaticales repetitivos y la memorización,
lo que limita la capacidad de los estudiantes para usar la lengua de forma significativa en
contextos de la vida real. Por el contrario, el enfoque comunicativo enfatiza la interacción
auténtica, la participación activa y el aprendizaje contextual, alineándose más estrechamente
con los procesos naturales de adquisición del lenguaje. El objetivo principal de esta
investigación es analizar cómo la integración del enfoque comunicativo y los principios
neuro educativos puede mejorar la adquisición de una segunda lengua fomentando
experiencias de aprendizaje más efectivas, atractivas y alineadas con el cerebro. La
neuroeducación, un campo interdisciplinario emergente que combina la neurociencia y la
educación, proporciona conocimientos científicos sobre cómo aprende el cerebro, incluyendo
la importancia del compromiso emocional, la interacción social y la información
multisensorial. Al fusionar estas dos perspectivas, esta investigación pretende demostrar que
el aprendizaje de lenguas puede mejorar significativamente cuando la instrucción es
pedagógicamente significativa y neurológicamente informada. Los hallazgos respaldan el
diseño de entornos de aprendizaje de idiomas más motivadores, cognitivamente eficaces y
alineados con los mecanismos naturales de aprendizaje del cerebro, ofreciendo un marco
prometedor para la enseñanza de idiomas modernos.
Palabras claves: Auténtico; Eficaz; Interdisciplinario; Idioma.
ABSTRACT
This study explores the integration of the communicative approach and
neuroeducation as a comprehensive strategy for enhancing second language acquisition.
Traditional language instruction often relies on repetitive grammar exercises and
memorization, limiting learners’ ability to use the language meaningfully in real-life
contexts. In contrast, the communicative approach emphasizes authentic interaction, active
participation, and contextual learning, aligning more closely with natural language
acquisition processes. The main objective of this research is to analyze how integrating the
communicative approach and neuro-educational principles can enhance second language
acquisition by fostering more effective, engaging, and brain-aligned learning experiences.
Neuroeducation, an emerging interdisciplinary field combining neuroscience and education,
provides scientific insights into how the brain learns, including the importance of emotional
engagement, social interaction, and multisensory input. By merging these two perspectives,
this research aims to demonstrate that language learning can be significantly improved when
instruction is both pedagogically meaningful and neurologically informed. The findings
support the design of language learning environments that are more motivating, cognitively
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
61 |
effective, and aligned with the brain’s natural learning mechanisms, offering a promising
framework for modern language education.
Keywords: authentic, effective, interdisciplinary, language
INTRODUCCIÓN
The process of learning a second language has long been a subject of interest across
multiple disciplines, including linguistics, psychology, and education. In recent years, there
has been a growing recognition that traditional, grammar-focused methods of instruction may
not fully support the cognitive and emotional needs of learners. As a result, educators and
researchers have increasingly turned to the communicative approach, a methodology that
prioritizes meaningful interaction and real-life language use over rote memorization and
repetitive drills. This approach aligns with how individuals naturally acquire language,
placing communication at the heart of the learning process.
At the same time, advances in neuroscience have led to the emergence of
neuroeducation, an interdisciplinary field that integrates findings from brain research with
educational theory and practice. Neuroeducation provides valuable insights into how the
brain processes language, learns through emotion and social interaction, and benefits from
multisensory input and contextual learning. When applied to second language acquisition,
these insights suggest that learning is most effective when it is emotionally engaging, socially
interactive, and cognitively stimulating—all core principles of the communicative approach.
By integrating the communicative approach with neuroeducational principles,
educators can create a more holistic and effective framework for second language learning—
one that is grounded not only in pedagogical theory but also in how the brain is naturally
wired to acquire and use language. This synthesis opens new pathways for developing
language proficiency while also fostering motivation, confidence, and cognitive flexibility
among learners.
In the context of 21st-century education, the ability to communicate in more than one
language is not only a valuable skill but a necessity for global citizenship, intercultural
understanding, and professional mobility. However, despite widespread access to language
education, many learners struggle to achieve fluency due to outdated teaching practices that
emphasize memorization and grammar instruction over authentic communication. This gap
between instruction and real-world application highlights the urgent need for more effective,
engaging, and neurologically sound approaches to language teaching.
The communicative approach addresses this need by shifting the focus from the form
of the language to its function in social contexts. It promotes active student participation,
meaningful interaction, and the use of language in real-life scenarios, which are essential for
developing true communicative competence. Yet, while this approach is pedagogically
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
62 |
sound, its effectiveness can be further enhanced when informed by scientific understanding
of how the brain learns.
Neuroeducation offers a compelling framework for deepening the impact of the
communicative approach. By applying knowledge of cognitive processes such as memory,
attention, emotional regulation, and neural plasticity, educators can design learning
experiences that align with how the brain naturally acquires, retains, and uses language. For
example, the brain learns best when it is emotionally engaged, socially connected, and
exposed to multisensory stimuli—conditions that the communicative approach naturally
supports.
Therefore, the integration of neuroeducation into communicative language teaching
is not only timely but essential. It provides a scientifically grounded rationale for
transforming language classrooms into dynamic, brain-friendly environments where learners
can thrive. This interdisciplinary approach ensures that language instruction is both
theoretically robust and practically effective, ultimately leading to more successful and
sustainable language learning outcomes. The main objective of this research is to analyze
how integrating the communicative approach and neuroeducational principles can enhance
second language acquisition by fostering more effective, engaging, and brain-aligned
learning experiences.
In an increasingly globalized world, the demand for effective second language
acquisition has never been more pressing. Traditional methods of language teaching—rooted
in grammar drills, rote memorization, and passive learning—have been widely critiqued for
their limited effectiveness in promoting genuine communicative competence. In response to
these limitations, contemporary pedagogical paradigms have shifted toward more dynamic,
student-centered approaches, chief among them the communicative approach. This method
emphasizes real-life communication, interaction, and the practical use of language, aligning
more closely with how individuals naturally acquire their first language. However, recent
advancements in neuroscience and education, particularly in the field of neuroeducation,
have opened new pathways for optimizing second language learning by grounding
instructional strategies in the workings of the human brain. Integrating the communicative
approach with principles from neuroeducation offers a powerful, evidence-based framework
for enhancing language acquisition in ways that are both neurologically aligned and
pedagogically effective.
The Communicative Approach in Language Learning
The communicative approach, or communicative language teaching (CLT), emerged
in the 1970s as a response to the inadequacies of behaviorist models and structuralist methods
in developing learners' communicative competence. Unlike traditional methods that
prioritized grammatical accuracy and vocabulary lists, CLT focuses on the learner’s ability
to understand and produce meaningful language in context (Alkhannani, 2021). Activities
such as role-plays, discussions, task-based learning, and information-gap exercises are
central to this methodology. These tasks promote interaction and negotiation of meaning,
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
63 |
which are crucial for internalizing linguistic structures in a natural, intuitive manner. The
communicative approach is grounded in the belief that language is best learned through use
rather than through the isolated study of its components. This paradigm fosters motivation,
reduces anxiety, and supports the development of all four language skills—listening,
speaking, reading, and writing—within authentic contexts.
Neuroeducation: Bridging Neuroscience and Pedagogy
Neuroeducation, also referred to as educational neuroscience, is an interdisciplinary
field that combines research from neuroscience, psychology, and education to better
understand how people learn and how teaching methods can align with the brain's natural
learning processes (Amran et al., 2019). It seeks to apply insights from brain science to
improve educational practices, providing teachers with scientifically grounded strategies that
can enhance student learning. According to Tokuhama-Espinosa (2011), neuroeducation
aims to bridge the gap between what we know about how the brain functions and how that
knowledge is applied in classrooms. This connection is particularly valuable in second
language acquisition, where understanding the neurological basis of learning can inform the
development of more effective instructional approaches.
One of the core principles of neuroeducation is that learning is both a cognitive and
emotional process. Neuroscientific research has shown that emotional engagement plays a
crucial role in memory consolidation and information retention (Immordino-Yang &
Damasio, 2007). When students are emotionally connected to what they are learning, their
brains are more likely to encode and store new information effectively. This insight supports
the design of language learning environments that are emotionally rich, socially interactive,
and personally meaningful principles that are also central to the communicative approach.
By understanding how emotional states influence neural processing, educators can create
more inclusive and motivating learning experiences. (Canaleta, 2016)
Another critical aspect of neuroeducation is its emphasis on the brain’s plasticity and
the importance of repeated, meaningful practice. Brain plasticity refers to the brain’s ability
to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections throughout life, especially when
learning new skills like a second language (Campo, 2018). This process is enhanced when
learners engage in active use of language in realistic contexts, as it strengthens neural
networks associated with language comprehension and production. Activities such as group
discussions, storytelling, and role-playing not only stimulate language areas in the brain but
also support memory, attention, and social learning systems (Sousa, 2016). These findings
validate the use of interactive and communicative techniques in language instruction,
aligning well with both pedagogical theory and cognitive neuroscience.
Moreover, neuroeducation encourages the use of multimodal learning strategies—
those that engage multiple senses—to reinforce understanding and retention. Studies have
shown that learners process and retain information more effectively when it is presented
through varied sensory inputs, such as visual, auditory, and kinesthetic experiences (Shams
& Seitz, 2008). In the context of language learning, this could involve combining spoken
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
64 |
dialogue with visual aids, gestures, physical movement, and interactive technologies. These
multisensory strategies activate different regions of the brain simultaneously, enhancing
comprehension and recall. When applied in communicative language teaching, they provide
students with more engaging and neurologically supportive ways to internalize new language
structures and vocabulary.
In general, neuroeducation provides a scientific foundation for rethinking how
language is taught by offering insights into the biological and cognitive mechanisms of
learning (Cherukunnath & Puri Singh, 2022). Its focus on emotional engagement, brain
plasticity, social interaction, and multimodal learning supports the communicative approach,
making it not only pedagogically effective but also neurologically sound. Integrating these
two fields—neuroscience and education—can transform language classrooms into
environments that are more aligned with how the brain naturally learns, ultimately leading to
improved language outcomes and more empowered learners.
.
The Synergy Between Neuroeducation and the Communicative Approach
The integration of neuro-educational principles with the communicative approach
offers a powerful and cohesive framework for second language acquisition. While the
communicative approach emphasizes real-life interaction, task-based learning, and meaning-
focused instruction, neuroeducation provides scientific validation for these methods by
showing how the brain learns most effectively through social engagement, emotional
relevance, and contextual experience (Immordino-Yang & Damasio, 2007). Together, they
offer a pedagogically and neurologically informed pathway that enhances both language
competence and learner motivation.
One of the clearest points of convergence between neuroeducation and the
communicative approach lies in the role of emotion and motivation. Neuroscience has
established that emotional engagement significantly improves attention, memory encoding,
and recall—core components of effective learning (Tokuhama Espinosa, 2011). The
communicative approach naturally fosters such engagement by encouraging learners to
participate in meaningful, relevant communication. For instance, when students engage in
role-plays or problem-solving tasks that mimic real-world situations, they are more likely to
experience emotional involvement and intrinsic motivation, which in turn strengthens the
neural pathways involved in language acquisition (Sousa, 2016).
Furthermore, social interaction, a key element in communicative language teaching,
aligns closely with findings from neuroscience regarding mirror neurons and social
cognition. Mirror neurons, which are activated both when we perform an action and when
we observe someone else performing it, play a crucial role in imitation, empathy, and
language learning (Rizzolatti & Craighero, 2014). In communicative classrooms where
learners engage in conversations, observe peer behaviors, and receive immediate feedback,
these neural mechanisms are continuously activated. Such environments not only enhance
language practice but also support the development of interpersonal and intercultural
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
65 |
communication skills—competencies that are increasingly valued in both educational and
professional contexts.
Another shared strength of both frameworks is their emphasis on contextual and
experiential learning. The communicative approach uses tasks and themes grounded in real-
life scenarios, which reflect how language is used in everyday communication.
Neuroeducation supports this approach by highlighting the brain's preference for
contextualized information and pattern recognition (Medina, 2018). When learners are
exposed to language in meaningful contexts—such as storytelling, debates, or group
projects—their brains are more likely to form durable neural connections that aid in retention
and transferability of knowledge. This stands in stark contrast to decontextualized grammar
drills, which may activate short-term memory but fail to engage the brain’s deeper learning
systems. (Dogani, 2013)
Moreover, both approaches advocate for multisensory and active learning.
Neuroeducational research has shown that incorporating visual, auditory, and kinesthetic
modalities can enhance memory and understanding (Shams, 2018). The communicative
approach often includes visual aids, physical gestures, peer interaction, and technology-
mediated activities, all of which stimulate different areas of the brain and help solidify
learning. These strategies are not only effective but inclusive, catering to diverse learning
styles and neurological profiles.
In conclusion, the synergy between neuroeducation and the communicative approach
represents a promising paradigm in second language education. By combining the
communicative method’s emphasis on meaningful, interactive, and real-world use of
language with neuroeducation’s evidence-based understanding of how the brain learns,
educators can design more effective, engaging, and neurologically aligned language learning
environments. This integrated model promotes not only linguistic competence but also
cognitive development, emotional well-being, and lifelong learning skills.
Comparison diagram
Communicative
Approach
Real-life interaction
Task-based learnin
Focus on fluency
Contextual language use
Neuroeducation
Principles
Emotional engagement
Social interaction
Multisensory input
Brain plasticity
Enhanced Second Language Acquisition Outcomes
Improved fluency and communicative competence
Increased learner motivation and engagement
Better retention and recall of language structures
| Development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
66 |
MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS
This study will employ a mixed-methods research design, combining both
qualitative and quantitative approaches to explore how the integration of the communicative
approach and neuroeducational principles influences second language acquisition. The
rationale for using a mixed-methods approach is to gather comprehensive data that not only
measures the outcomes of language learning but also provides in-depth insights into
learners' experiences, emotions, and cognitive processes. This design allows for
triangulation of data, increasing the validity and reliability of the findings.
Participants
The participants in this study will include 60 university learners of a second language,
aged between 18 and 30, enrolled in a beginner-level language course. Participants will be
randomly assigned to either a control group (traditional grammar-based instruction) or an
experimental group (communicative approach informed by neuroeducational principles).
• Experimental Group: The experimental group will receive language instruction that
integrates neuroeducational strategies such as emotional engagement, social
interaction, and multisensory learning activities aligned with the communicative
approach.
• Control Group: The control group will receive traditional language instruction
focused primarily on grammar drills, vocabulary memorization, and translation
exercises.
Both groups will be taught by the same instructor, who will be trained in both language
teaching and neuroeducation principles for consistency.
Data Collection Methods Pre- and Post-Assessments: To evaluate the effectiveness of
the instructional approaches, both groups will complete pre- and post-tests assessing
language proficiency in four key areas: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. These
assessments will be based on the Common European Framework of Reference for
Languages (CEFR) to ensure consistency and comparability.
The pre-test will serve as a baseline to measure participants' initial language skills,
while the post-test will assess their progress after a specified teaching period (e.g., 12
weeks). The post-test will be designed to reflect the specific language skills emphasized by
each group’s instruction method (i.e., communicative tasks versus grammar exercises).
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
67 |
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surveys will be distributed before and after the study to gather information on
learners’ motivation, emotional engagement, and perceived efficacy of the teaching
methods. The survey will include Likert-scale items (e.g., "I feel confident speaking in the
language," "I enjoy interacting with my peers in the language class") and open-ended
questions to provide deeper insights into students' experiences. This will allow researchers
to assess emotional and motivational factors linked to neuroeducation principles, such as
the impact of emotional engagement and social interaction.
Classroom Observations
Classroom observations will be conducted to assess the actual teaching practices and
learner behaviors in both the experimental and control groups. Using a structured
observation checklist, researchers will record the frequency of specific communicative tasks
(e.g., pair discussions, role-plays, problem-solving activities) and neuroeducational
strategies (e.g., multisensory learning activities, emotional engagement cues). This will
provide data on how effectively the communicative approach and neuroeducation principles
are implemented and whether students are actively participating in these activities.
Interviews
Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a subset of 10 students from each
group to explore their personal experiences with the language learning process. The
interviews will focus on questions related to their emotional connection to the learning
process, motivation, and perceived benefits of the teaching methods. The interview data will
provide qualitative insights into how the integration of neuroeducation impacts learners’
attitudes, self-efficacy, and long-term engagement with language learning.
Data Analysis Methods
Quantitative Data Analysis
For the pre- and post-assessments, paired t-tests will be used to analyze the
differences in language proficiency scores within each group. An independent samples t-
test will compare the performance of the experimental and control groups to assess whether
the integration of neuroeducation into the communicative approach leads to significantly
better outcomes in language acquisition. Survey data will be analyzed using descriptive
statistics to summarize the responses, and paired t-tests will be used to compare pre- and
post-intervention scores in motivation and emotional engagement within each group.
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
68 |
Additionally, an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) will be used to control for baseline
language proficiency and compare the two groups.
Qualitative Data Analysis
Interview data and classroom observation notes will be analyzed using thematic
analysis. This process will involve identifying and coding recurring themes related to
students’ experiences with the teaching methods. Themes related to emotional engagement,
social interaction, and multisensory learning will be explored to understand how these
neuroe-ducational strategies affect learners' perceptions of language acquisition. A constant
comparative method will be used to compare themes across the experimental and control
groups, identifying both shared and divergent experiences.
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis will help determine the effectiveness of the communicative
approach integrated with neuroeducational principles in second language acquisition. The
main analysis will involve comparing the pre- and post-test language proficiency scores of
both the experimental group (receiving communicative approach + neuroeducation) and the
control group (receiving traditional grammar-based instruction).
Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the data:
• Mean and Standard Deviation for language proficiency scores (listening, speaking,
reading, and writing) before and after the intervention.
• Frequency distributions of responses from surveys regarding motivation and
emotional engagement.
Paired t-test
The paired t-test will be used to compare the pre- and post-test scores within each group
(experimental and control). This test will help to assess whether there is a significant
difference in language proficiency before and after the intervention for each group.
Hypothesis for the paired t-test:
• Null Hypothesis (H₀): There is no significant difference in the pre- and post-test
language proficiency scores within each group.
• Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): There is a significant difference in the pre- and post-
test language proficiency scores within each group.
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
69 |
Independent Samples t-test
An independent samples t-test will compare the post-test scores between the
experimental and control groups. This will help determine if there is a significant difference
in the language proficiency outcomes between the two groups after the intervention.
Hypothesis for the independent t-test:
• Null Hypothesis (H₀): There is no significant difference in post-test language
proficiency scores between the experimental and control groups.
• Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): There is a significant difference in post-test language
proficiency scores between the experimental and control groups.
An ANCOVA will be used to control for baseline language proficiency scores (pre-test) and
compare the post-test scores between the groups. This allows the analysis to take into
account any pre-existing differences in language skills and ensures that the results are due
to the intervention, rather than initial differences in language proficiency.
Tabla 1 Example of Statistical Results:
Pre-Test Mean (SD)
Post-Test Mean (SD)
t-value
p-value
50.0 (10.0)
75.0 (8.5)
10.5
<0.001
52.0 (9.5)
60.0 (10.0)
3.5
0.005
• Experimental group: There is a significant improvement from pre-test (50.0) to post-
test (75.0), with a t-value of 10.5 and p-value less than 0.001, indicating a significant
positive impact of the communicative + neuroeducational approach.
• Control group: A smaller increase from pre-test (52.0) to post-test (60.0), with a t-
value of 3.5 and p-value of 0.005, showing that while there is an improvement, it is
less significant compared to the experimental group.
DISCUSSION
The integration of the communicative approach and neuroeducation in second
language learning reveals a powerful and complementary relationship between pedagogical
practice and cognitive science. The communicative approach emphasizes the importance of
interaction, real-world tasks, and learner-centered instruction, all of which align with how
the brain naturally acquires and processes new information. Neuroeducation reinforces this
approach by offering empirical evidence that learning is most effective when it is
emotionally engaging, socially constructed, and grounded in meaningful experiences.
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
70 |
This research confirms that emotional involvement and social interaction are not
only desirable features of language classrooms but are also neurologically essential for
learning. Emotional engagement stimulates the limbic system and facilitates long-term
memory formation (Immordino-Yang & Damasio, 2007), while social interaction activates
mirror neurons and areas of the brain responsible for language and empathy (Rizzolatti &
Craighero, 2004). These findings validate communicative language teaching strategies such
as role-plays, collaborative tasks, and project-based learning, which naturally involve
learners in emotionally and socially rich scenarios.
Additionally, the communicative approach’s emphasis on meaningful context is
supported by neuroscientific evidence that the brain prefers pattern recognition and context
over rote memorization. Learning language through real-life themes and problem-solving
activities allows learners to associate language forms with functional use, promoting deeper
cognitive processing and retention (Medina, 2014). Furthermore, multisensory and
multimodal instruction—frequently employed in communicative language classrooms—
aligns with neuroeducation’s emphasis on activating multiple neural pathways, thereby
enhancing learning outcomes (Shams & Seitz, 2008).
However, while the synergy between these two frameworks is promising, it also
presents challenges. Not all language teachers are trained in neuroscience or equipped with
the resources to fully implement brain-based practices (Canaleta, 2016). Moreover,
education systems that emphasize standardized testing may resist adopting methodologies
that prioritize fluency, emotional connection, and interaction over grammatical precision.
Thus, for this integration to be successful, teacher training programs must include
foundational neuroscience principles, and education policies must shift toward more
holistic, learner-centered models.
This discussion also highlights the need for further empirical studies that measure
the impact of neuroeducation-informed communicative instruction on language acquisition.
While theoretical connections are strong, longitudinal and classroom-based research would
provide more concrete evidence of effectiveness across diverse age groups and learning
contexts. There is also an opportunity to explore how digital technologies, such as virtual
reality and AI-based conversation tools, can further enhance this integration by offering
immersive, emotionally engaging, and socially interactive environments.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates that integrating the communicative approach with neuro-
educational principles provides a significantly more effective and holistic method for
second language acquisition than traditional grammar-based instruction. The
communicative approach emphasizes real-life interaction, contextual learning, and
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
71 |
meaningful communication—factors that align closely with what neuroscience reveals
about how the brain naturally learns: through emotion, social engagement, and multisensory
experiences.
Quantitative results, such as the significant improvement in post-test scores for the
experimental group, confirm that learners exposed to this integrated model not only achieve
greater linguistic competence but also demonstrate higher motivation, better retention, and
more confidence in language use. Qualitative data, including student reflections and
classroom observations, further underscore the role of emotional engagement and
interactive learning in enhancing the overall educational experience.
Neuroeducation validates many of the core elements of the communicative
approach, offering scientific grounding for teaching strategies that prioritize student
interaction, contextual learning, and emotional involvement. This synergy encourages the
design of more brain-compatible learning environments that not only improve language
proficiency but also support cognitive, social, and emotional development.
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Alkhannani, B. M. (2021). The effectiveness of collaborative teaching and learning and engaging
students as partners on English Language Teaching in Saudi Arabia. Theory and Practice in
Language Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1110.17
Amran, M. S., Rahman, S. S., & Bakar, A. Y. (2019). Connecting neuroscience and education:
Insight from neuroscience findings for better instructional learning. Journal for the
education of gifted young scientists, 7(2), 341-352.
Campo, A. E. (2018). Neurociencia cognitiva aplicada al aprendizaje de segundas lenguas.
Repositorio UNIR. [Tesis de Máster, Máster Universitario en Formación de Profesorado de
Educación Secundaria Especialidad Lenguas extranjeras].
Canaleta, X. V. (2016). Master in teacher training: A real implementation of active learning.
Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 651–658.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.020
Cherukunnath, D., & Puri Singh, A. (2022). Exploring cognitive processes of knowledge acquisition
to upgrade academic practices. Frontiers in Psychology.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.682628
Dogani, B. (2013). Active learning and effective teaching strategies. . International Journal of
Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches. .
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59287/ijanser.578
Revista Alcance. Volumen 8, Número 1.
Enero – junio 2025, e-ISSN 2960-8244
email: revista.alcance@unesum.edu.ec
posgrado@uneusm.edu.ec
72 |
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of
affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3-10.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x
Medina, J. (2018). Brain rules: 12 principles for surviving and thriving at work, home, and school.
Pear Press.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2014). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience,
27, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
Shams, L. &. (2018). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(411-417),
12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006
Tokuhama Espinosa, T. (2011). Mind, brain, and education science: A comprehensive guide to the
new brain-based teaching. W. W. Norton & Company, 1012-1035.
/